We must formally repeal P-016 to ensure that its provisions are not subject to statutory inheritance by future proposals, leaving no room for overly broad interpretations that grant excessive executive authority to some or prevent other proposals that ‘conflict’ with its reach from being submitted for a vote.
Formally repealing P-016 is essential to prevent doctrinal carryover, which would effectively mandate changes to every single product’s pricing and perpetuate the apparently enormous and broad executive power it granted into subsequent proposals.
It’s easy to dismiss the necessity of this repeal when you’re an executive empowered from the wide berth of authority enabled by the legislative entanglement, rather than those whose contributions would be directly affected by it.
Obviously, you’re the one at the keyboard posting proposals, but it has become increasingly clear that you’re doing so only with the direct or implied approval of Primate. While his stepping up when others weren’t undeniably commendable, it seems this has created an implicit dynamic where Primate is treated as though he holds a supervisory role, with the power to influence your position or responsibilities as if he were your employer. This perceived dependency further underscores the need for a reassessment of governance to ensure the integrity of the DAO. Hence another reason for replacement.