# P-017 ACCEPTED: Stop Execution P-16 Price Changes

**URL:** <https://talk.tezos.domains/t/p-017-accepted-stop-execution-p-16-price-changes/268>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Tags:** delegates\
**Created:** [November 26, 2024, 7:00pm UTC](https://talk.tezos.domains/t/p-017-accepted-stop-execution-p-16-price-changes/268 "2024-11-26T19:00:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c67d28/32.png) [@Noor](https://talk.tezos.domains/u/Noor)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2024, 7:18am UTC](https://talk.tezos.domains/t/p-017-accepted-stop-execution-p-16-price-changes/268/5 "2024-11-29T07:18:06Z")

</div>

I modified the phrasing to ‘A draft based on P-016’, but the essence of the message remains unchanged. The tenets outlined in that draft are egregious. It proposes ‘a gradual price escalation from 1 tez/year to 6.25 tez/year over 24 months,’ representing **an astounding 625% increase from the current rate**.

Moreover, the 200% price surge in P-016 disproportionately benefits those managing the Tezos Domains project, offering **little to no added value for the users** who bear the brunt of these hikes.

Users gain nothing substantial from a proposed 625% price escalation. One of the justifications cited is ‘loss aversion.’ Can you not perceive how terrible this reasoning is? At the very least, it’s undeniable that this constitutes a poor strategy for fostering user retention.

---

_[View the full topic](https://talk.tezos.domains/t/p-017-accepted-stop-execution-p-16-price-changes/268)._