I modified the phrasing to ‘A draft based on P-016’, but the essence of the message remains unchanged. The tenets outlined in that draft are egregious. It proposes ‘a gradual price escalation from 1 tez/year to 6.25 tez/year over 24 months,’ representing an astounding 625% increase from the current rate.
Moreover, the 200% price surge in P-016 disproportionately benefits those managing the Tezos Domains project, offering little to no added value for the users who bear the brunt of these hikes.
Users gain nothing substantial from a proposed 625% price escalation. One of the justifications cited is ‘loss aversion.’ Can you not perceive how terrible this reasoning is? At the very least, it’s undeniable that this constitutes a poor strategy for fostering user retention.