It wasn’t critique, it was rude, un-hinged and not a place for the forum.
The forum code of conduct wasn’t even written by myself. I was just following the code of conduct of the forum, apologies if you feel like I’m doing it for some type of gain, this isnt the case.
Yes this is true, however, you cannot keep trying to revert all changes you disagree with. The proposal adds time constraints to 1 particular proposal type, not all of them. Unfortunately, you haven’t been doing much debating, nor providing data or facts to proposals, it’s been more like emotionally fueled conversation that isn’t at all constructive.
As you mentioned Kevin, ‘we debate, evaluate data, we reflect community sentiment and if warranted, we change course’ - This is exactly what is going on here, the reasons are valid enough to bring to a proposal.
Kevin, I’m honestly not sure what point you’re trying to make. Based on your logic, if the “Removal and Replacement of the Steward of Governance to Strengthen DAO Integrity” proposal were accepted and I was voted out, what would prevent me, or anyone else from immediately submitting a counter-proposal to reverse it?
Without the process improvements I’ve already made (which is allowed & in the job description) along with this proposal, this kind of back-and-forth could become endless. Even with the changes AND this proposal, it’s still possible, but at least now there are time-based limits in place to give decisions room to take effect before being challenged again.
Again like you said, ‘we debate, evaluate data, we reflect community sentiment and if warranted, we change course’ - not ah’ lets put in a counter proposal because my vote got rejected.